My Manifesto: The Incoherent Ramblings of a Madman

I do not understand why the USA is not letting the Hatians in as refugees: Their leader is in exile; They are in anarchy; and a "peace keeper" force is being led in by the United Nations to bring peace and stability to the country. If the UN feels that the people are so in danger that they require armed forces to be sent in to save them then why does the USA not recognise them as genuine refugees? And if the UN does not feel that the people are in danger, then why are they sending in a peace keeper force?

It is as bad as Australia not accepting people from Iraq/Afghanistan as refugees. On the one hand the "coalition of the willing (stupid)" is there bombing these countries leaders; these peoples homes; and infrastructure to "free the people" from ruthless dictatorships (only to later install a ruthless dictatorship - but that's another story) - and on the other hand they are saying that those fleeing from these countries are not genuine refugees.